![]() ![]() After checking a few options (Storyist, Story Mill and Scrivener I settled on the latter. So no reason not to get started right away? It seems to have everything I need – including a cork board that I can stick notes and photos on, all my research and notes – and the interface looks very similar to lots of Mac stuff I’m used to. ![]() Posted 4 September 2009 by roelani filed under Technology I can write faster than I can sew.Writing Showdown: Storyist VS Storymill VS Scrivener Unfortunately I’ve just agreed to write some more chapters for the Make it and Mend it book – in exchange for not having to make a tablecloth for the book. With the rising popularity of the Mac OS platform, a number of small developers and software companies have found niche markets for themselves the Getting Things Done crowd, the Tweaking freaks, the App Launchers all have their own list of best-of software titles and nifty little apps. There are so many choices now to replace default apps that it can get pretty confusing to find the right tool.īrowsing for writing software is also becoming quite confusing there are now a number of very nicely designed apps that can help you finish or start your projects. Some of those target fiction writers more than others. Here’s a quick rundown of the most popular ones and their main features. I didn’t include general writing software, like Apple’s Pages or OpenOffice this list is really geared toward organized writing, software that both lets you plan and write from start to finish. Storyist, from Storyist SoftwareĪfter experimenting with Storyist, I moved on to StoryMill, from Mariner Software, the makers of MacJournal and MacGourmet, two very good database-driven applications for OS X. The team behind StoryMill is much bigger, and mostly this shows in the overall finish and polish that went into its development. The app itself is gorgeous and streamlined, and the interface simply makes you want to sit and write. Fullscreen support is marginally better than Storyist, but only because it’s been implemented longer. The sidebar pane is more visually pleasing, but mostly serves the same purpose as Storyist’s you get default panes for Characters, Locations and Research, and the rest is handled via folders and smart views. It’s a nice compromise between structure and freedom, and it’ll do for most writers.Īgain, this one is strongly geared towards fiction, perhaps even more so than Storyist, with the addition of the Timeline feature which is heavily advertised as its strong point. Perhaps this is why I moved away from StoryMill altogether while it’s a very nicely designed piece of software overall, the Timeline has always been a frustrating issue for me. There is no way to properly manage different timeframes if you set it to display hours, you’ll have hours until the end of your manuscript, which to me seems absolutely useless. Most stories will partly happen in real time, partly in flashback, memories and long, uneventful stretches of passing time. Having set the timeline to Hourly or Daily to get that important, detailed scene just right, you then have to scroll left-to-right all the way to infinity to set the rest of your action. ![]() Frustrating, and there seems to be no fix in sight. ![]() Placing events on the timeline itself is also a bit of a chore, as it doesn’t behave the way you’d expect events tend to jump, and aligning on the grid is difficult. I’ll go right ahead and admit that my first experience with Scrivener wasn’t a happy one. After meddling with the very simple-to-use Storyist and Storymill, I felt more than a little overwhelmed with the huge amount of options and freedom inherent in Scrivener’s design. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |